Since I'm in Trauma Reporting... I should be doing my radiography.
It's my birthday month, a year older, a year wiser?

- ultrasound hepatobiliary
- CT thorax - ricocheting bullet effect (seriously!)
- CT brain/ skull/ cervical spine
in the past week:
- me getting UD44 (finally!)
- DH losing 2kg+ in a week
- LO navigating stairs confidently
- my lil' babbler wanting to do phonics now
INTRODUCTION It is intended that the syllabus should be delivered through approximately 30 hours of formal physics teaching. For those undergoing specialist training in the UK, this would usually be scheduled over an eight week period starting in early October with the intention that trainees sit the First FRCR Examination at the Winter sitting in early December. Further elements of physics, as detailed in the syllabus for the Final FRCR Examination, should be taught later in the first year of training. AIMS The aim of the examination is to ensure that candidates have a sound knowledge of the basis of physics related to diagnostic imaging. This includes a detailed understanding of the principles of diagnostic imaging equipment and the properties of diagnostic images. Candidates should be able to describe the factors affecting image quality and patient dose and be able to use equipment correctly. When linked with their subsequent radiology training, this will enable safe and effective application of medical diagnostic imaging techniques for the benefit of patients. Furthermore, within the current UK framework for radiation protection of staff and patients, candidates will understand the basis for radiation protection guidance and have the knowledge to enable them to act as qualified practitioners within the remit of the UK legislation. OBJECTIVES The candidate should be able to demonstrate an understanding of SYLLABUS Fundamental properties of matter and radiation decay Biological effects of radiations General radiation protection Responsibility for radiation safety Responsibilities of referrer, operator, practitioner, employer and medical physics expert Projection and tomographic images Production of x-rays Image intensifiers and digital detectors Basic physics of CT Methods Fundamentals of the gamma camera EXAMINATION STRUCTURESyllabus for First FRCR Examination
Published: December 2005
Interactions of ionising radiation with matter, including contrast agents
Risks of radiation
Principles of radiation protection
Kerma, absorbed dose, equivalent dose, effective dose and their units
Radiation protection of the patient including pregnancy, infants and children
Radiation protection of staff and members of the public
Use of radiation protection devices
Local rules and procedures
Role of radiation protection adviser and radiation protection supervisor
Classified workers
Restriction of exposure (through design, systems of work and ppe)
Dose limits
Equipment used for medical exposures
Notification of incidents
Dose constraints for comforters and carers
Routine inspection and testing of equipment
Notification of incidents
Patient identification and consent
Dose recording and diagnostic reference levels
Adequate training and local entitlement
Employer procedures
Quality assurance programmes, clinical evaluation of exposure and clinical audit
Notification of incidents
Research exposures, including ethics committees and dose constraints
Health screening
Analogue and digital images
Image display
Image quality, including contrast, spatial resolution and noise
General and mammographic x-ray equipment
Film-screen radiography
Digital and computed radiography
Factors affecting radiation dose and image quality
Operator controlled variables
Measurement of image quality
Factors affecting radiation dose and image quality
Factors affecting radiation dose and image quality
Diagnostic reference levels, including high dose techniques
Magnitude and measurements
Properties of radiopharmaceuticals
Factors affecting radiation dose and image quality
ARSAC
Radiation protection requirements for
Editor: The term “Aunt Minnie” describes an imaging finding that is both perfectly obvious and pathognomonic of a disease (1,2). We have tried to answer the question of who coined the term by asking the family of the late Dr Edward B. Neuhauser. Gernda Neuhauser, his wife, is certain that he had no aunt or relative named Minnie. However, she believes that the term was adopted by her late husband from the lore of New England. It may have been a local phrase with special meaning, similar to “Uncle Charlie” or “Uncle Ben.” Regardless of its origin, it remains a useful descriptor in the practice of radiology today. A well-known example occurred approximately 4 years ago in the radiology department at Boston Children's Hospital. A pediatrician was consulted for a second opinion regarding a 4-year-old child who was thought to have been battered. He brought the radiologist a skeletal survey. The radiologist looked at the survey and said, “This is leukemia.” Startled, the clinician protested that the complete blood cell count was normal. The radiologist replied, “What can I say? It's an Aunt Minnie!” Several weeks later, a repeat complete blood cell count was abnormal and the child was symptomatic with leukemia.REFERENCES